Data center interconnect spans a wide range of distances, from a few hundred meters inside a campus to hundreds of kilometers between regions. Two reach tiers dominate the short end of that spectrum: 2 kilometers for campus building-to-building links and 10 kilometers for metro data center interconnect. Both use single-mode fiber and duplex LC connectors. Both are direct-detect PAM4 interfaces. The differences lie in the wavelength plan, the optical power budget, the laser design, and the physical environment each tier is built to serve.
The 2-kilometer tier is represented by FR interfaces. It connects buildings on a corporate campus, a university, or a data center campus with multiple halls. The fiber path may cross outside plant, but it remains within a controlled environment where the operator owns or controls the fiber. The 10-kilometer tier is represented by LR interfaces. It connects data centers within a metropolitan area, often over leased fiber that traverses carrier patch panels, utility vaults, and rights-of-way that the operator does not control.
The distance gap is fivefold, but the engineering gap is shaped by the environment as much as the fiber loss. A 10-kilometer metro link must account for connector losses in carrier patch panels, splice losses in leased fiber, and the possibility of fiber re-routing over the life of the installation. A 2-kilometer campus link operates in a more controlled environment where the fiber path is known and stable.
1. What 2 km DCI Covers
A 2-kilometer interconnect connects buildings on a campus. The fiber runs between a data center and an office building, between two data halls in separate buildings, or between a campus core and an edge facility. The path is typically owned or leased by the same organization that operates the network. The fiber is single-mode, the connectors are duplex LC, and the link is engineered with a known fiber plant.
The 2-kilometer tier is defined by FR interfaces. A 400GBASE-FR4 module uses four CWDM wavelengths, each carrying 100G PAM4, multiplexed onto a single fiber pair. An 800GBASE-FR4 module uses eight wavelengths of 100G PAM4 or four wavelengths of 200G PAM4. The internal CWDM multiplexer combines the wavelengths onto one fiber for transmit and separates them from one fiber for receive.
1.1 2 km DCI Characteristics
Reach: 2 kilometers.
Wavelength: CWDM at 1271, 1291, 1311, and 1331 nm for FR4.
Optical architecture: CWDM multiplexing on a single fiber pair.
Connector: Duplex LC.
Fiber count per link: 2 fibers.
Power budget: 8 to 10 dB.
Laser cooling: Uncooled or lightly cooled.
Environment: Campus, controlled fiber plant.
2. What 10 km DCI Covers
A 10-kilometer interconnect connects data centers within a metropolitan area. The fiber runs between two facilities that may be several miles apart, traversing streets, carrier hotels, and utility infrastructure. The fiber is often leased from a carrier, and the operator may not control the patch panels or splice enclosures along the path. The link must be engineered with margin for the additional connector and splice losses that accumulate in a metro fiber plant.
The 10-kilometer tier is defined by LR interfaces. A 100GBASE-LR1 module uses a single 1310 nm wavelength carrying 100G PAM4 over a duplex LC pair. A 400GBASE-LR4 module uses four LAN-WDM wavelengths around 1310 nm, each carrying 100G PAM4, multiplexed onto a single fiber pair. An 800GBASE-LR4 module uses four wavelengths of 200G PAM4.
2.1 10 km DCI Characteristics
Reach: 10 kilometers.
Wavelength: LAN-WDM at approximately 1295, 1300, 1305, and 1309 nm for LR4; 1310 nm for LR1.
Optical architecture: LAN-WDM or single wavelength on a duplex LC pair.
Connector: Duplex LC.
Fiber count per link: 2 fibers.
Power budget: 12 to 14 dB.
Laser cooling: Temperature-controlled.
Environment: Metro, leased or carrier fiber.
3. Wavelength Plan and Laser Design
FR uses CWDM wavelengths with 20 nm spacing. The wide spacing tolerates the wavelength drift of uncooled or lightly cooled lasers, which reduces module cost and power consumption. The CWDM multiplexer is relatively simple and inexpensive because the channels are far apart.
LR uses LAN-WDM wavelengths with approximately 4.5 nm spacing. The tighter spacing requires temperature-controlled lasers and a more precise multiplexer. The tighter spacing is necessary to keep the four wavelengths within the 1310 nm window, where chromatic dispersion is near zero, while maintaining enough separation for the multiplexer to separate them.
| Parameter | 2 km DCI (FR) | 10 km DCI (LR) |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelength Plan | CWDM | LAN-WDM or single 1310 nm |
| Spacing | 20 nm | ~4.5 nm (LR4) |
| Wavelengths | 1271/1291/1311/1331 nm | ~1295/1300/1305/1309 nm |
| Laser Cooling | Uncooled or lightly cooled | Temperature-controlled |
| Multiplexer Type | CWDM | LAN-WDM |
| Multiplexer Cost | Lower | Higher |
4. Power Budget and Link Engineering
The 2-kilometer link budget is sized for a controlled campus fiber plant. Fiber loss at 1310 nm over 2 kilometers is approximately 0.7 dB. Connector and splice losses add 1 to 2 dB. The CWDM multiplexer adds 1 to 2 dB. The total path loss is typically 3 to 5 dB, and the module provides 8 to 10 dB of budget, leaving ample margin for aging and temperature variation.
The 10-kilometer link budget is sized for a metro fiber plant with more connector and splice losses. Fiber loss at 1310 nm over 10 kilometers is approximately 3.5 dB. Connector and splice losses in a leased metro path can add 2 to 4 dB. The LAN-WDM multiplexer adds 2 to 3 dB. The total path loss is typically 8 to 11 dB, and the module provides 12 to 14 dB of budget.
| Parameter | 2 km DCI (FR) | 10 km DCI (LR) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber Attenuation | ~0.7 dB | ~3.5 dB |
| Connector and Splice Loss | 1–2 dB | 2–4 dB |
| Internal WDM Loss | 1–2 dB | 2–3 dB |
| Total Path Loss | 3–5 dB | 8–11 dB |
| Typical Power Budget | 8–10 dB | 12–14 dB |
| Transmitter Output Power | Moderate | Higher |
| Receiver Sensitivity | Moderate | Higher |
5. Fiber Plant and Environment
FR and LR both use duplex LC connectors and two fibers per link. The physical connector type is identical. The difference lies in the fiber plant environment and the engineering discipline each tier requires.
A campus FR link is engineered with a known fiber path. The operator knows the length of the fiber, the number of patch panels, and the splice locations. The link budget calculation is straightforward, and the margin is generous because the path is stable.
A metro LR link is engineered with less certainty. The fiber may be leased, and the operator may not know the exact number of patch panels or splice enclosures along the path. The link budget must include margin for unexpected losses. The temperature-controlled lasers and higher-power transmitters in LR modules provide that margin.
| Parameter | 2 km DCI (FR) | 10 km DCI (LR) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber Ownership | Owned or controlled | Owned or leased |
| Fiber Path | Known and stable | May traverse carrier patch panels |
| Connector Count | Few | Variable, potentially many |
| Splice Count | Few | Variable, potentially many |
| Link Budget Certainty | High | Lower; margin required |
| Typical Environment | Campus outside plant | Metro outside plant |
6. Application Boundaries
The 2-kilometer tier covers campus building-to-building links. It connects a data center to an office building, two data halls in separate buildings, or a campus core to an edge facility. The distance is short enough that no amplification is required, and the fiber plant is controlled enough that the link budget can be calculated with confidence.
The 10-kilometer tier covers metro data center interconnect. It connects two data centers within a city, often over leased fiber that traverses carrier infrastructure. The distance is long enough that the link budget must be engineered with margin, but still short enough that no amplification is required. The 10-kilometer tier is the highest-reach direct-detect interface before coherent optics become necessary.
| Application | 2 km DCI (FR) | 10 km DCI (LR) |
|---|---|---|
| Campus Building-to-Building | Primary | Possible |
| Data Center Campus Link | Primary | Possible |
| Metro DCI (≤10 km) | Not viable | Primary |
| Carrier Point of Presence Link | Not viable | Primary |
| Regional DCI (>10 km) | Not viable | Not viable |
| AI Scale-Across (≤10 km) | Possible | Primary |
7. Module Cost and Power
FR modules cost less than LR modules. The CWDM multiplexer, uncooled lasers, and relaxed wavelength tolerances reduce the module cost. LR modules cost more because of the LAN-WDM multiplexer and temperature-controlled lasers. The premium for LR over FR is typically 20 to 40 percent depending on the data rate and the vendor.
Power consumption is similar between the two tiers. A 400GBASE-FR4 module draws approximately 10 to 12 watts. A 400GBASE-LR4 module draws approximately 12 to 14 watts. An 800GBASE-FR4 module draws approximately 14 to 16 watts. An 800GBASE-LR4 module draws approximately 16 to 18 watts. The difference is modest and does not dominate the deployment decision.
| Module | Typical Power | Relative Cost |
|---|---|---|
| 400G FR4 | 10–12 W | Baseline |
| 400G LR4 | 12–14 W | +20–40% |
| 800G FR4 | 14–16 W | Baseline |
| 800G LR4 | 16–18 W | +20–40% |
8. Standards and Ecosystem
FR is defined by IEEE 802.3cu for 100GBASE-FR1 and 400GBASE-FR4, and by IEEE 802.3df for 800GBASE-FR4. LR is defined by IEEE 802.3ba for 100GBASE-LR4, by IEEE 802.3cu for 100GBASE-LR1, by IEEE 802.3bs for 400GBASE-LR4, and by IEEE 802.3df for 800GBASE-LR4.
| Standard | Interface | Reach | Wavelength |
|---|---|---|---|
| IEEE 802.3cu | 100GBASE-FR1 | 2 km | CWDM 1310 nm |
| IEEE 802.3cu | 400GBASE-FR4 | 2 km | CWDM 1310 nm |
| IEEE 802.3df | 800GBASE-FR4 | 2 km | CWDM 1310 nm |
| IEEE 802.3ba | 100GBASE-LR4 | 10 km | LAN-WDM 1310 nm |
| IEEE 802.3cu | 100GBASE-LR1 | 10 km | 1310 nm |
| IEEE 802.3bs | 400GBASE-LR4 | 10 km | LAN-WDM 1310 nm |
| IEEE 802.3df | 800GBASE-LR4 | 10 km | LAN-WDM 1310 nm |
9. Comparison Summary
| Dimension | 2 km DCI (FR) | 10 km DCI (LR) |
|---|---|---|
| Reach | 2 km | 10 km |
| Wavelength Plan | CWDM | LAN-WDM or single 1310 nm |
| Spacing | 20 nm | ~4.5 nm |
| Laser Cooling | Uncooled or lightly cooled | Temperature-controlled |
| Multiplexer | CWDM | LAN-WDM |
| Connector | Duplex LC | Duplex LC |
| Fiber Count per Link | 2 | 2 |
| Power Budget | 8–10 dB | 12–14 dB |
| Module Power | 10–16 W | 12–18 W |
| Module Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Environment | Campus, controlled fiber | Metro, leased fiber |
| Primary Application | Campus building-to-building | Metro DCI |
10. Selection Framework
The choice between the 2-kilometer and 10-kilometer tiers is determined by the physical distance and the fiber plant environment.
Distance under 2 kilometers on a controlled campus fiber plant: Use FR. The module is cheaper, the CWDM wavelength plan is sufficient, and the link budget is straightforward.
Distance between 2 and 10 kilometers: Use LR. FR cannot reach, and LR provides the additional power budget and tighter wavelength control needed for the longer path.
Distance beyond 10 kilometers: Use ER or ZR. LR is rated for 10 kilometers and does not have the budget for longer reaches without regeneration or coherent optics.
The fiber plant environment matters as much as the distance. A 5-kilometer link on a controlled campus fiber plant may be served by LR with margin to spare. A 5-kilometer link on a leased metro fiber plant may require LR for the additional margin needed to accommodate unknown connector and splice losses. The choice is not just about distance; it is about how much uncertainty the fiber path introduces.
11. Common Misconceptions
"2 km and 10 km DCI use different connectors." False. Both use duplex LC connectors and two fibers per link. The physical fiber plant is identical.
"10 km DCI requires amplification." False. The 10-kilometer tier is still direct-detect PAM4 and does not require amplification. Amplification becomes relevant beyond 40 kilometers with coherent optics.
"FR modules can be used for 10 km links." False. FR is rated for 2 kilometers. For 10-kilometer links, LR is required.
"LR modules are always more expensive per gigabit." Not necessarily. LR modules cost more per port, but both tiers use two fibers per link. The cost difference is in the module, not the fiber. The cost per gigabit depends on the data rate and the module vendor.
"2 km DCI is obsolete." False. Campus building-to-building links are a permanent part of data center infrastructure. FR remains the standard interface for these links because it matches the distance and the controlled fiber environment.
12. Summary
The 2-kilometer and 10-kilometer DCI tiers serve different physical environments. The 2-kilometer tier, represented by FR interfaces, uses CWDM wavelengths with 20 nm spacing and uncooled or lightly cooled lasers. It connects buildings on a campus over a controlled fiber plant. The 10-kilometer tier, represented by LR interfaces, uses LAN-WDM wavelengths with 4.5 nm spacing and temperature-controlled lasers. It connects data centers within a metropolitan area over leased or carrier fiber.
Both tiers use duplex LC connectors and two fibers per link. Both are direct-detect PAM4 interfaces. The differences lie in the wavelength plan, the laser design, the power budget, and the fiber plant environment. FR is cheaper and simpler for campus links under 2 kilometers. LR provides additional margin for metro links up to 10 kilometers.
The choice between them is determined by the physical distance and the fiber plant environment, not by a performance comparison. A campus uses FR. A metro area uses LR. The two tiers coexist in the same network, connected by ER or ZR where the distance exceeds 10 kilometers.
TEL:+86 132 6656 7067




















































>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>